Image and text searching techniques

ABSTRACT

Conducting a search for both text and images includes receiving input, which may include one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and text terms. The received input may be compared with searchable image characteristics and text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments. A search result is produced based on the comparison. The searchable image characteristics and text terms may be indexed in a uniform data format that enables a search engine to use the same search methodology to search for both images and text. The uniform data format may be an inverted index data format. The produced search result may include identifiers for one or more images and text segments that have been retrieved for display in a ranked manner based on similarity metrics.

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/255,399, filed Dec. 15, 2000, and titled “Image Searching Techniques,” which is incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to image and text searching techniques.

BACKGROUND

The process of finding and retrieving images stored electronically (e.g., on a computer or the Internet) has become increasingly difficult for a variety of reasons. For instance, with the explosive growth of the Internet, the number of searchable images available on the Internet has dramatically increased. With the increased number of images, the ability of conventional systems, methods, and computer programs to perform searching and retrieval functions in an efficient, useful, and timely manner has been challenged.

The ability of conventional systems, methods, and computer programs to efficiently find and retrieve desired images in a database has been hampered by poor indexing methodologies, inefficient organization, and inconsistent formatting of the images being searched and/or retrieved. Similar problems also may be experienced by other electronic applications involving a large quantity of images that may be searched for and retrieved. These problems may be compounded when the desired search result includes multiple formats (e.g., images and text).

SUMMARY

In one general aspect, conducting a search for both text and images includes receiving input, which may include one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and text terms. The received input is compared with searchable image characteristics and text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments. A search result is produced based on the comparison.

Implementations may include one or more of the following features. For example, the searchable image characteristics and the text terms may be indexed in a uniform data format that enables a search engine to use the same search methodology to search for both images and text. The uniform data format may be an inverted index data format.

The comparison may include a single comparison of the received input with the searchable image characteristics and the text terms that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments. Alternatively, the comparison may include a first comparison of the received input with the searchable image characteristics that have been indexed in the single format and a second comparison of the received input with the searchable text terms that have been indexed in the single format.

The multiple stored images and text segments may be stored in a single electronic data store. Alternatively, the multiple stored images may be stored in a first electronic data store and the multiple text segments may be stored in a second electronic data store that differs from the first electronic data store.

The produced search result may include identifiers for one or more images and text segments that have been retrieved for display in a ranked manner. The images and the text segments may be ranked based on similarity metrics.

These general and specific aspects may be implemented using a system, a method, or a computer program, or any combination of systems, methods, and computer programs.

Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a portion of an image.

FIG. 2 is a histogram graph of the image portion of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a histogram vector of the image portion of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a portion of an image.

FIG. 5 is a joint histogram vector of the image portion of FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a portion of an image.

FIG. 7a illustrates a joint histogram graph.

FIG. 7b illustrates a joint histogram vector corresponding to the joint histogram graph of FIG. 7a.

FIG. 7c illustrates a posterized joint histogram vector corresponding to the joint histogram graph of FIG. 7a and the joint histogram vector of FIG. 7b.

FIG. 8 illustrates images indexed using an inverted index.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart of a process for performing an image and/or a text search.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a general computer system.

FIG. 11 a is a block diagram of a storage device.

FIG. 11b is a block diagram of multiple storage devices.

Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a portion of an image 100 may be divided into picture elements (pixels) 110. In this example, the displayed portion of the image 100 includes nine pixels 110. In general, an image 100 may be divided into any number of pixels 110. A higher number of pixels 110 typically correlates to a finer image resolution. A pixel 110 is generally used as the basic unit of programmable color in an image 100. The color of a pixel 110 may be based on any number of colors used in a colorspace, e.g., the standard RGB colorspace. For purposes of illustration, FIG. 1 includes three colors: red (R), green (G), and blue (B).

A pixel 110 also may include other features in addition to color. Thus, each pixel 110 in an image 100 may be characterized by one or more features. Other features in addition to color may include, for example, edge density, texturedness, gradient magnitude, rank, and brightness. The edge density at a particular pixel 110 may be defined as the ratio of edges to pixels 110 in a small neighborhood surrounding the pixel 110. The texturedness at a particular pixel 110 may be defined as the number of neighboring pixels 110 whose intensities differ from the particular pixel 110 by more than a fixed value. The gradient magnitude at a particular pixel 110 may be defined as a measure of how rapidly intensity is changing in the direction of greatest change. The rank of a particular pixel 110 may be defined as the number of pixels 110 in the local neighborhood whose intensity is less than the intensity of the particular pixel 110. In general, these features, including color, are likely to exhibit invariance to changes among similar images, which may be useful when conducting a search for, e.g., similar images, or transitions between images.

An image 100 may be represented in different ways. For example, information such as the features described above may be extracted from the image 100. Extracting the information may be accomplished by any number of techniques or combinations of techniques including extracting the information for each pixel 110 in an image 100, every other pixel 110 in the image 100, every nth pixel 110 in the image 100, or one or more selected blocks of pixels 110. For example, in one implementation, the information for every pixel 10 in the image 100 is extracted. Some information may be extracted for some pixels, some information may be extracted for no pixels, and some information may be extracted for areas of pixels. Extracting the information is generally accomplished based on predefined criteria, an algorithm or algorithms, or any combination of these. These and other predefined criteria and/or algorithms may be embodied in computer software and performed by a computer.

The extracted information may be used to compute a histogram that is representative of the image 100. Generally, a histogram is a one-dimensional representation of the image that may be created using one extracted feature. For example, if color is the extracted feature used to create the histogram, the histogram may be called a color histogram. Representing an image as a histogram may be useful as part of an image retrieval process or otherwise.

As illustrated in FIG. 2, image 100 (FIG. 1) may be expressed as a histogram, which is depicted as a one-dimensional graph 200. The horizontal axis represents the extracted pixel feature, which includes the colors red, green, and blue in this example. The vertical axis represents a total number of pixels 110 in the image 100, which, in this example, is nine. The graph may be created by evaluating each pixel 110 in image 100, extracting the color information for each pixel 110, and incrementing a count in the appropriate color position(s) on the graph 200 corresponding to the extracted color information. Thus, as the graph 200 illustrates, image 100 includes four red pixels, two green pixels, and three blue pixels.

The features of image 100 are shown as having mutually exclusive characteristics. However, the extracted pixel features and pixel characteristics need not be mutually exclusive. Rather, one pixel may include red and green characteristics, such that it is effectively counted twice, or some weighting factor may be applied to discount the shared characteristic.

As shown in FIG. 3, in addition to expressing the histogram as a graph, the histogram may be expressed as a histogram vector 300. The histogram vector 300 includes a vector element 310 corresponding to each possible value of each extracted feature. In general, a histogram vector 300 may include any number of vector elements 310, each of which corresponds to one of the particular feature values being extracted from within an image 100. For example, if color is the extracted feature and the color feature includes up to 256 possible colors, then the histogram vector may include one vector element 310 for each of the 256 possible colors.

The value of each vector element 310 typically represents a number of pixels 110 in the image 100 that include the feature value represented by that vector element 310. For example, in FIG. 3, the histogram vector 300 includes one vector element 310 for each color, where each vector element 310 represents the number of pixels of a given color in the image 300. The histogram vector 300 may be computed by extracting the color information about each pixel 110 and incrementing a count in the appropriate color vector element(s) 310 corresponding to the extracted color information.

A histogram may be computed by systematically evaluating each pixel of an image to determine the feature value or values that the particular pixels represent. Thus, in this instance, the histogram 200 and the histogram vector 300 may be used to represent the portion of the image 100. Computing the histogram may be accomplished by computer software, which includes an algorithm that is performed by a computer, or otherwise.

As stated above, other features may be extracted about each pixel, such as texture or centeredness. Like color in the histogram discussed above, these other features may be used to create a histogram vector.

When more than one type of information is extracted about an image, a multi-dimensional dimensional histogram, which is typically referred to as a joint histogram, may be computed.

FIG. 4 illustrates a portion of an image 400, where each pixel 410 in the image 400 is represented by two features, namely a color feature and a brightness feature. In this example, each pixel 410 is evaluated to determine whether it may be represented by at least one of three colors and whether it may be represented as either bright (b) or non-bright (nb).

In general, a joint histogram is more descriptive of an image than the single-feature histogram described with reference to FIG. 2. FIG. 5 illustrates that the portion of the image 400 shown by FIG. 4 may be expressed as a joint histogram vector 520, 530. The joint histogram vector 520 may include a distinct vector element 510 corresponding to each possible combination of joint features within pixels 410. For example, if two features are extracted about each pixel 410 of an image 400, such as the color information (R,G,B) and brightness information (b, nb) shown by FIG. 4, then each pixel 410 may be represented by a combination of color and brightness. Six possible combinations of joint features exist when three values of color (R, G, B) are combined with two values of brightness (b, nb). As such, the joint histogram vector 520 corresponding to the portion of image 400 may include vector elements 510 for each of the six possible combinations of the color and brightness features. Each joint feature corresponds to a vector element 510 within the joint histogram vector 520. This example illustrates that although five individual features (R,G,B, b, nb) of image 400 are represented, a joint histogram 520 generally increases dimensionality of the typical one-dimensional histogram space by using more than five vector elements 510 to represent the image 400 based on those five individual features.

Each vector element 510 in a joint histogram vector 530 typically includes the number of pixels in the image that are described by a particular combination of joint features. For example, each vector element 510 in joint histogram 530 may be used to represent the total number of pixels 410 included in image 400 corresponding to a particular color-brightness combination.

The joint histogram vector 520, 530 for an image 400 also may be used to represent more than two features extracted about each pixel 410 in the image 400. For example, if six features in each pixel 410 are being represented by a particular joint histogram 520, and if each feature has a range of four values (e.g., the color feature may have red, green, blue, and yellow values), then the joint histogram vector 520 may include 4096 vector elements 510.

Applying a Weighting Factor to a Joint Histogram

In addition or as an alternative to using the extracted features to compute a joint histogram 520, a weighting factor may be applied to a joint histogram 520. Typically, the weighting factor may be used to modify the count for one or more of the vector elements 510 within the joint histogram 520. The weighting factor may be based on one or more features extracted about the image 400, including the features discussed above (e.g., color, edge density, texturedness, gradient magnitude, brightness, and rank). The weighting factor also may be based on new information extracted about the image that differs from the previously extracted information. For example, where the joint histogram features include color, edge density, texturedness, gradient magnitude, brightness, and rank, it is possible to extract some other information, such as centeredness, and to use that other information to generate or invoke a weighting factor.

In one implementation, a centeredness feature may be extracted about each pixel 410 in the image 400 and used as a basis for weighting. The centeredness feature also may be referred to as the “elliptical distance” weight feature, as it is generally used to weight the values of features representing pixels that are closer to the center of an image. Objects closer to the center of an image are often more visually significant than objects closer to the edge of an image. When used to apply a heavier weighting factor to the values of features representing pixels positioned close to the center, this weight feature is useful for identifying images of similar appearance. For example, when searching a database for images that are similar in appearance to another image, it may be possible to identify more visually similar images if more weight is given to the pixels in the center of the image.

The weighting factor may be determined on a pixel-by-pixel basis or otherwise. Referring to FIG. 6, one example of determining specific weightings for pixels in an image 600 that is divided into a 13×13 array of pixels includes determining whether the particular pixels are positioned within any of several imaginary concentric ellipses 610, 620, and 630.

In this implementation, three imaginary ellipses 610, 620, and 630 surround the center point of image 600. The three ellipses may vary in the width and height of their axes, respectively, although the ellipses generally remain concentric. Each pixel in the image 600 is assigned one of four possible weights based on the position of the pixel relative to the ellipses. For instance, a pixel located between the outer ellipse 610 and the edge 605 of the image 600 may be assigned a weight of one. Thus, when this pixel is used to increment an appropriate vector element in the joint histogram, which is based on the combination of the other extracted features, that vector element will be incremented by a count of one. Pixels located between the middle ellipse 620 and the outer ellipse 610 also may be assigned a weight of one. Pixels located between the inner ellipse 630 and the middle ellipse 620 may be assigned a weight of two, and pixels located within the inner ellipse 630 may be assigned a weight of four. Other weighting schemes also are possible. For instance, additionally or alternatively, negative weighting factors and/or fractional weighting factors may be applied to the pixels in the image. For example, if a commonly occurring feature is identified, a negative weighting factor may be applied to minimize the visual weight given to the feature.

Any number of other methods may be used to determine how to apply the weighting factor to a particular feature. For example, instead of concentric ellipses, other geometric constructs may be used along with various weighting schemes. Additionally or alternatively, a weighting factor may be based upon one or more features that have a particular feature value, such as whether a pixel or area of pixels have a predetermined brightness value. In addition, collection statistics (e.g., heuristics or Gaussians) may be used to determine what features and feature values to use to determine and apply a weighting factor.

In one implementation, the weighting factor may be determined and applied as the joint histogram is being computed, and, for example, as the features of each pixel are resolved. Alternatively, the weighting factor may be determined and applied to the joint histogram after the joint histogram has been computed.

Posterizing a Histogram and a Joint Histogram

A histogram may be modified through posterization, a process that takes advantage of variations in the visual characteristics of a feature based on the number and/or weight of pixels that exhibit that feature. A weight may include either or both of a count of pixels or a weighed count of pixels in which a weighting factor has been applied to the count of pixels. Posterizing generally includes dividing at least one vector element within a histogram vector into a number of subsets. For example, variations in the weight of a particular feature for an image generally reflect variations in the visual characteristics of that image. As such, the display of an image having a particular feature with a relatively low weight generally differs from the display of an image having the same feature with a relatively high weight. By contrast, images having a feature of similar weight, such as, for example, a relatively low weight and a slightly lower weight, may generate a visually similar display. Accounting for these differences and similarities, the range of weights for a given feature may be divided into subranges, each of which includes a set of weights corresponding to features that are visually similar to each other, but different from other subranges of weights corresponding to features that are visually dissimilar to each other.

Generally, the result of the posterization process is a second histogram vector that includes a vector element corresponding to each vector element subrange generated from the first histogram vector element. The order of the vector elements within the second histogram vector may be arranged according to the weights of the corresponding vector elements in the first histogram, or otherwise. For instance, vector elements may be ordered with the vector elements having the most significant weight first.

In addition to posterizing a one-dimensional histogram, the posterization process also may be applied to a joint histogram. For example, as shown in FIG. 7a, a joint histogram graph 710 may include four different joint features on the horizontal axis. The vertical axis represents the respective weight of each joint feature of an image (not shown), which, in this example, are red-bright (rb), red-non-bright (r-nb), blue-bright (bb), and blue-non-bright (b-nb). In this example, the red-bright (rb) joint feature has a weight of 5000, the red-non-bright (r-nb) joint feature has a weight of 1000, the blue-bright (bb) feature has a weight of 3000, and the blue-non-bright (b-nb) feature has a weight of 500.

As shown in FIG. 7b, joint histogram vector 720 includes vector elements 722, 724, 726, and 728, which correspond, respectively, to each joint feature included in joint histogram graph 710 (FIG. 7a). The appropriate weight for each joint feature is included in a corresponding vector element within the joint histogram vector 720.

In this example, some or all of the vector elements may be divided into subranges that may be based, for example, on the point at which a joint feature of one weight appears visually different from the same joint feature of a different weight. With reference to the implementation of FIG. 7a, a red-bright (rb) joint feature with a weight of 2000 may appear visually different from a red-bright (rb) joint feature with a weight of 5000. Other distinguishing criteria also may be used. For example, statistics or collection statistics may be used.

To realize these distinctions, a second joint histogram vector may be created, as shown in FIG. 7c. The second joint histogram vector 730 includes a vector element for each joint feature subset. In the example provided with respect to FIG. 7c, the red-bright (rb) joint feature with a weight between 1 and 2500 may define one vector element, the red-bright (rb) joint feature with a weight between 2501 and 5000 may define another vector element, and the red-non-bright (r-nb) joint feature with a weight between 1 and 2500 may define yet another vector element, as shown, for instance, by second joint histogram vector 730. The ranges defined by these example subsets are arbitrary; other ranges may be used to provide more meaningful search feedback when appropriate.

In this manner, using posterized joint histograms, relevant distinctions among values for joint features may be recognized through the mere inclusion or non-inclusion within a posterized joint histogram vector element. Thus, unlike the first joint histogram vector 720 (FIG. 7b), the vector elements within second joint histogram vector 730 (FIG. 7c) need not include values that represent the weight of particular joint features. Instead, the vector element within the second joint histogram vector may include a mere notation (e.g., a symbol or binary number) that indicates whether or not that particular joint feature with that specified subset of weights is present in the image. For example, with respect to FIG. 7c, the subset of the red-bright (rb) vector element having a weight range of 1-2500 is marked by a “N” (e.g., binary “0”) because the particular image used to generate joint histogram vector 720 does not include the red-bright (rb) subset of the joint feature having a weight of between 1-2500. By contrast, the subset of the red-bright (rb) vector element having a weight range of 2501-5000 is marked by a “Y” (e.g., binary “1”) because the image includes the red-bright (rb) joint feature with a weight of between 2501-5000. Such a representation enables binary comparison of a posterized joint histogram for searchable data (e.g., images or text) against posterized joint histograms for other searchable data.

Each joint feature may or may not be divided into subsets according to weight. Additionally or alternatively, different joint features may be divided into different numbers of subsets, where one joint feature may include more or less subsets than another joint feature. For instance, one joint feature may have more or less visual significance than another joint feature, and may therefore be suitable for more or less subsets.

The division of joint features into subsets may be determined empirically in accordance with human perception, or may be determined by a computer. Moreover, statistics and/or collection statistics may be used to determine the points at which to divide joint features into subsets.

A posterized joint histogram may include a joint histogram in which a weighting factor has been applied. In one implementation, the posterized joint histogram is calculated after the weighting factor has been applied to the joint histogram.

Dividing the joint histogram into a posterized joint histogram may be useful in a number of applications. One particular example is an image search and retrieval system, such as is described below.

Applying Text Methodology to Image Searching Using Joint Histograms

Image searching, indexing, and retrieval may be performed in a number of different applications, such as, for example, as part of an online system operated by a web host having members. Other applications may include, for instance, searching electronic information within an electronic data store, where the electronic information includes indexed images; searching photographic archives; filtering search results; and human feature recognition (e.g., facial recognition).

Performing an image search generally includes receiving a set of features corresponding to image characteristics, comparing the received set of features to features that have been indexed for multiple stored images, and producing a search result based on the comparison. The search may be performed, for example, by a web host, an Internet service provider, a computer, or computer software operating on a computer or across a number of computers.

The set of features received as input may include posterized histogram features, joint histogram features, posterized joint histogram features, weighted joint histogram features, and any other combination of posterized, weighted, and/or joint histogram features. Additionally or alternatively, the received set of features may include data in a text, audio, visual, or graphical format, or any combination of these formats or other formats. The data may be converted into a posterized histogram, a joint histogram, a posterized joint histogram, a weighted joint histogram, and any other combination of posterized, weighted, and/or joint histogram features.

The received features may be entered in a graphical user interface as part of a query in an online search engine, which may include one or more of the formats discussed above. For example, where the received features are entered as a text string, the received text may correspond to image characteristics. Alternatively, the received set of features may be received by clicking on an image or a portion of an image that is displayed on the computer screen of a user, where the received set of features may include all or only a portion of an image that is designated by the user. The set of features also may be received by drawing on a screen (e.g., a touch screen) or through a voice command, such as, for example, a voice command spoken into a microphone attached to an electronic device.

When at least a portion of an image is received, the features of the image that correspond to searchable image characteristics are identified. If the received image does not have a corresponding joint histogram, then a joint histogram is computed for the received image based on the features identified as corresponding to the searchable image characteristics. The joint histogram that is computed also may include a joint histogram to which a weighting factor has been applied, such as a weighting factor based on a centeredness feature. Additionally or alternatively, a posterized joint histogram may be computed for the received image. The features of the received image may be identified by extracting the features from each pixel in the image.

After receiving or resolving a set of features, the received set of features are compared to features that have been indexed for multiple stored images. A text search methodology may be used to compare the set of features to features that have been indexed for multiple stored images. For example, where multiple stored images are indexed based on associated features using an inverted indexing method, the received features may be matched against the features that are included as part of an inverted index.

Generally, in an inverted index, a relationship exists between features and images that include those features. The set of features also may include a list of features that includes a relationship between the features and images including those features. For example, the indexed features or the list of the indexed features may include information or may point to information that identifies images that include the features. An example of an inverted index is shown by FIG. 8, where the red-bright and red-non-bright features are shown as corresponding to, for example, three arbitrary images. The index also may include any other type of additional information regarding the images, such as weights, and/or other characteristics, which may be used for similarity metrics, as described below.

Based on a comparison against the inverted index of the received features or information reflective of the received features, a search result is produced. The search result may include a set of images for display in a ranked manner. The set of images is generally ranked in order from an image that is most relevant to the received set of features to an image that is least relevant to the received set of features. The decision on which images are retrieved and the order that the images are displayed may be determined based on similarity metrics or otherwise. Similarity metrics may include one or more different techniques, such as, for example, a Boolean model, a vector space model, a probabilistic model, latent semantic indexing, neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy set retrieval. These and other techniques may be applied to text retrieval systems to retrieve images as described. In general, the highest ranked results will be the retrieved images that include the largest number of received features or the highest proportion of important features.

With reference to FIG. 9, in one implementation, a user of an online system may enter a text string as part of a query in a graphical user interface that is associated with a search engine (step 910). A determination may be made as to whether the input is in a searchable format (step 920). If the input is not in a searchable format, then the input may be resolved into a format that is searchable (step 930). Search terms in the original input or resolved search terms then are compared against an index of search terms (step 940), and matches are related to corresponding images (step 950). For example, a text string may be compared against searchable text metadata (step 940), and matching searchable text metadata may be indexed with corresponding images (step 950). The search may produce a result that includes a ranked list of images that were identified during the comparison (step 960).

Based on the list of images that are produced, the user of the online system may further refine the search for other images by selecting (e.g., clicking on) one of the images that was produced to cause the system to use the image as an input to restart the search process of FIG. 9. In this instance, the produced image is used to generate searchable criteria as necessary, for example, by associating the image with a respective joint histogram (steps 920-930). The joint histogram for the image generally includes a weighted joint histogram, a posterized joint histogram, and any other combination of posterized, weighted and/or joint histograms. The joint histogram of the image that was selected then is compared with the index of joint features (step 940). The joint features identified through the comparison may be related to images that include the same features as the selected image, e.g., via the inverted index (step 950). Indexed images that include the same features then are retrieved using similarity metrics to determine which of the matching images to display and the order in which to display them (step 960).

In another implementation, the set of received features (step 910) may include a set of features corresponding to posterized image characteristics. In this instance, the received set of images are compared (step 940) to features that have been indexed and that correspond to posterized image characteristics for multiple stored images.

Indexing images for use in a searchable and/or inverted index may include receiving an image, computing a joint histogram that includes a set of joint features for the image, and creating an index of the joint features and/or weights within the joint histogram using an index methodology. Typically, the index is searchable.

Indexing images for use in a searchable and/or inverted index also may include receiving an image, computing a posterized joint histogram that includes a set of posterized joint features for the image, and creating an index of posterized joint features within the posterized joint histogram using an index methodology. Typically, the index is searchable.

The index methodology may include, for example, an inverted index. In this example, the inverted index may include a list of joint features that each are associated with images that include a corresponding particular joint feature. Typically, the inverted index may include information that indicates which images include that joint feature, where the image is located, and/or what portion of the image includes the joint feature. Additionally or alternatively, the index may include a list of posterized histogram features, posterized joint histogram features, and any other feature that may be searched, along with a list of documents including that feature.

Searching Text and Images Based on a Single Format

A search may be performed for both text and images. In this case, inputs generally include (step 910) or are resolved to include (step 930) one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and text terms. The inputs are compared against searchable image characteristics and text terms (step 940) for multiple stored images and text segments that have been indexed in a searchable format (generally a single format) (step 950), and a search result is produced based on the comparison (step 960).

The searchable image characteristics that are received as input (step 910) may include a posterized histogram, a joint histogram, a posterized joint histogram, a weighted joint histogram, and other combinations of posterized, weighted and/or joint histograms. Other inputs may include an image, an image portion, a graphic, a drawing, other searchable formats, and any combination of these. If necessary, these other inputs may be resolved into histogram-type formats (step 930).

Image characteristics associated with joint histograms, posterized joint histogram, weighted joint histograms, and other combinations of posterized, weighted, and/or joint histograms may be indexed in a data format typically used to index text. One example of such an index is an inverted index. These type of image characteristics may be indexed in an inverted index at least for the reason that the characteristics of an image or portion of an image may be treated like words that are a part of a document. For example, the characteristics of a posterized joint histogram include a unique identifier corresponding to a particular posterized joint feature. The unique identifiers are indexed and each index entry points to all of the images that include the particular identifier for that entry.

The inverted index may include in the same index both an index of characteristics corresponding to images and documents and an index of words corresponding to images and text segments. The received inputs may be compared with the indexed image characteristics and the text terms in a single search. Alternatively, the received inputs may be compared with the indexed image characteristics and the text terms as part of multiple searches. For example, the received inputs may be compared with the indexed image characteristics in a first search and then compared with the indexed text terms in a second search.

The search results may include retrieving identifiers for one or more images and text segments to be displayed in a ranked manner. The identifiers may include a hypertext link, a title, a description, an image portion, a text segment, or any notation which may be used to represent and identify an image or a text segment. A relative ranking among one or more of the images and text segments may be determined based on similarity metrics.

FIG. 10 shows exemplary components 1000 of a system that may be used to search, retrieve, and index images and/or text, such as a computer system. The hardware setup may include various input/output (I/O) devices (e.g., mouse 1003, keyboard 1005, and display 1007) and general purpose computer 1010 having central processor unit (CPU) 1020, I/O unit 1030, memory 1040, and storage 1050 that stores data and various programs such as operating system 1060 and one or more application programs 1070. Computer system 1010 also typically includes some sort of communications card or device 1080 (e.g., a modem or a network adapter) for exchanging data with a network 1090 via a communications link 1095 (e.g., a telephone line, a wireless network link, a cable network). Other examples of system 1000 include a workstation, a server, a device, a component, other equipment, or some combination of these elements that is capable of responding to and executing instructions in a defined manner.

Referring to FIG. 11a, images and text may be stored in a single storage or memory device 1110, which may include a logical separation for the different types of data (e.g., images and text) within the device 1110. Additionally or alternatively, images and text may be stored in physically separate storage and/or memory devices 1120, as shown with reference to FIG. 11b.

The described systems, methods, and techniques may be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations of these elements. Apparatus embodying these techniques may include appropriate input and output devices, a computer processor, and a computer program product tangibly embodied in a machine-readable storage device for execution by a programmable processor. A process embodying these techniques may be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform desired functions by operating on input data and generating appropriate output. The techniques may be implemented in one or more computer programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Each computer program may be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language. Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD-ROM). Any of the foregoing may be supplemented by, or incorporated in, specially-designed ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).

Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for conducting a search for both text and images, the method comprising: receiving input including one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms, wherein the searchable image characteristics are represented by joint features of a joint histogram; comparing the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments, wherein the indexed searchable image characteristics include individual joint features to which associated stored images correspond; and producing a search result based on the comparison.
 2. The method as in claim 1 wherein the searchable image characteristics and the searchable text terms are indexed in a uniform data format that enables a search engine to use the same search methodology to search for both images and text.
 3. The method as in claim 2 wherein the uniform data format comprises an inverted index data format.
 4. The method as in claim 1 wherein producing a search result includes retrieving identifiers for one or more images and text segments to be displayed in a ranked manner.
 5. The method as in claim 4 wherein retrieving the identifiers includes determining a relative ranking among one or more of the images and the text segments based on similarity metrics.
 6. The method as in claim 1 wherein comparing the input includes a single comparison of the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments.
 7. The method as in claim 1 wherein comparing the input includes: a first comparison of the input with searchable image characteristics that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments; and a second comparison of the input with searchable text terms that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments.
 8. The method as in claim 1 wherein the multiple stored images and text segments are stored in a single electronic data store.
 9. The method as in claim 1 wherein the multiple stored images are stored in a first electronic data store and the multiple text segments are stored in a second electronic data store that differs from the first electronic data store.
 10. A computer program for conducting a search for both text and images, the computer program being stored on a computer readable medium or a propagated signal and comprising: a receiving code segment that causes the computer to receive input including one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and text terms, wherein the searchable image characteristics are represented by joint features of a joint histogram; a comparing code segment that causes the computer to compare the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments, wherein the indexed searchable image characteristics include individual joint features to which associated stored images correspond; and a producing code segment that causes the computer to produce a search result based on the comparison.
 11. The computer program of claim 10 wherein the searchable image characteristics and the searchable text terms are indexed in a uniform data format that enables a search engine to use the same search methodology to search for both images and text.
 12. The computer program of claim 11 wherein the uniform data format comprises an inverted index data format.
 13. The computer program of claim 10 wherein the producing code segment includes a retrieving code segment that causes the computer to retrieve identifiers for one or more images and text segments to be displayed in a ranked manner.
 14. The computer program of claim 13 wherein the retrieving code segment includes a determining code segment that causes the computer to determine a relative ranking among one or more of the images and the text segments based on similarity metrics.
 15. The computer program of claim 10 wherein the comparing code segment causes the computer to perform a single comparison of the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments.
 16. The computer program of claim 10 wherein the comparing code segment causes the computer to: perform a first comparison of the input with searchable image characteristics that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments; and perform a second comparison of the input with searchable text terms that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments.
 17. The computer program of claim 10 wherein the multiple stored images and text segments are stored in a single electronic data store.
 18. The computer program of claim 10 wherein the multiple stored images are stored in a first electronic data store and the multiple text segments are stored in a second electronic data store that differs from the first electronic data store.
 19. A system for conducting a search for both text and images, the system comprising: a receiving component that is structured and arranged to receive input including one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms, wherein the searchable image characteristics are represented by joint features of a joint histogram; a comparing component that is structured and arranged to compare the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments, wherein the indexed searchable image characteristics include individual joint features to which associated stored images correspond; and a producing component that is structured and arranged to produce a search result based on the comparison.
 20. The system of claim 19 wherein the searchable image characteristics and the searchable text terms are indexed in a uniform data format that enables a search engine to use the same search methodology to search for both images and text.
 21. The system of claim 20 wherein the uniform data format comprises an inverted index data format.
 22. The system of claim 19 wherein the producing component includes a retrieving component that is structured and arranged to retrieve identifiers for one or more images and the text segments to be displayed in a ranked manner.
 23. The system of claim 22 wherein the retrieving component includes a determining component that is structured and arranged to determine a relative ranking among one or more of the images and the text segments based on similarity metrics.
 24. The system of claim 19 wherein the comparing component performs a single comparison of the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments.
 25. The system of claim 19 wherein the comparing component performs: a first comparison of the input with searchable image characteristics that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments; and a second comparison of the input with searchable text terms that have been indexed in the single format for multiple stored images and text segments.
 26. The system of claim 19 wherein the multiple stored images and text segments are stored in a single electronic data store.
 27. The system of claim 19 wherein the multiple stored images are stored in a first electronic data store and the multiple text segments are stored in a second electronic data store that differs from the first electronic data store.
 28. The method as in claim 1 wherein: receiving the input includes receiving input including one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms, wherein the searchable image characteristics are represented by posterized joint features of a posterized joint histogram; and comparing the input includes comparing the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments, wherein the indexed searchable image characteristics include individual posterized joint features to which associated stored images correspond.
 29. The computer program of claim 10 wherein: the receiving code segment causes the computer to receive input including one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms, wherein the searchable image characteristics are represented by posterized joint features of a posterized joint histogram; and the comparing code segment causes the computer to compare the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments, wherein the indexed searchable image characteristics include individual posterized joint features to which associated stored images correspond.
 30. The system of claim 19 wherein: the receiving component is structured and arranged to receive input including one or more search criteria for at least one of searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms, wherein the searchable image characteristics are represented by posterized joint features of a posterized joint histogram; and the comparing component is structured and arranged to compare the input with searchable image characteristics and searchable text terms that have been indexed in a single format for multiple stored images and text segments, wherein the indexed searchable image characteristics include individual posterized joint features to which associated stored images correspond. 